How do Librarians Assess Website Quality?

Via Gary the second issue of Google's Newsletter for Librarians was released.

In A Librarian's Guide to Finding Web Sites You Can Trust Karen G. Schneider, the Director of Librarians' Internet Index, wrote about what she looks at in deciding weather or not a resource is trustworthy.

The main criteria are:

  1. Availability (reliable hosting and free information)

  2. Credibility
  3. Authorship
  4. Link Rot
  5. Legality

With this site I have not got much love from the librarian community. Likely largely because of the following:

  • bad spelling

  • going way off topic
  • sometimes expressing opinion that may be taken as fact
  • focusing on a topic that is generally hated (SEO) contained within a link rich loved topic (search)
  • selling a marketing ebook at a fairly high price point
  • having no credentials (in part because there really are none in this industry - though I should make an about page!)

You don't have to have the love from librarians to succeed on the WWW, but if you are in a field where competing channels do it is going to be an uphill battle unless you focus on a niche or get lots of link love and attention love from people within your industry.

It is really worth looking at how librarians review websites, because if you fit their guidelines it should also be easy to get many other links. If Google is sending out a message to 20,000 librarians then maybe they will use that information, and maybe Google likes many of the same things that the librarians do.

One curious question remains: how can Google not use a page title on their newsletter for librarians?

Keyword Research Tip: Set Up an AdWords Account for Competitors

Google is getting much better at extracting potential keyword information when you set up an account.

Lets say your site competed with SeoBook.com (and you are thus evil). You could set up a new ad campaign and act like it is for SeoBook.com (by entering www.SeoBook.com as your ad URL).

Google will then give you keyword groups based on the content of SEO Book.

  • seo

  • search engine
  • search engine optimization
  • search engine submit
  • Miscellaneous keywords

Each of the categories has a list of keywords in it where you can add all or some of them to your keyword list.

  • seo

    • seo book
    • seo rank
    • seo optimization
    • seo rankings
    • seo placement
    • seo ranking
    • seo
    • seo tips
    • how to seo
    • multilingual seo
    • seo elite
    • seo writing
    • seo software
    • seo consultants
    • seo service
  • search engine
    • seo search engine
    • submission search engines
    • search engines
    • rank search engines
    • search engine registration
    • search engine ranking
    • thai search engines
    • submission to search engines
    • rank in the search engines
    • add url to search engines
    • foreign search engines
    • search engines australia
    • writing for search engines
    • search engine rankings
    • stomping the search engines
    • search engine url submission
    • submit to search engines
    • dutch search engine
    • search engine marketing
  • search engine optimization
    • search engine optimization seo
    • search engine optimization tips
    • search engine optimization
    • search engine optimization seo services
    • search engine optimization ebook
    • search engine optimization and placement
    • search engines optimization
    • search engine optimization information
    • search engine optimization submission
    • multilingual search engine optimization
    • search engine optimization company
    • search engine optimization forum
    • search engine optimization forums
    • calgary search engine optimization
    • search engine optimization analysis
    • search engine optimization advice
    • search engine optimization software
    • search engine optimization thailand
    • vancouver search engine optimization
    • search engine optimization cost
    • search engine optimization tools
    • houston search engine optimization
  • search engine submit
    • search engines submissions
    • search engine submissions
    • search engine submission
    • search engine submission software
    • search engine submission guide
    • canada search engine submission
    • canadian search engine submission
    • search engine submit
  • Miscellaneous keywords
    • url cloaking

Google gives slightly different word sets for similar sites. For Linkhounds Google AdWords gave the following terms under the SEO category:

  • seo tools
  • effective seo
  • seo placement
  • seo optimization
  • seo url
  • seo tips
  • seo
  • seo advantage
  • seo rankings
  • seo business
  • seo tool
  • seo software
  • arizona seo
  • foreign seo
  • seo copywriting
  • seo analysis
  • seo company
  • seo ebook
  • seo report
  • seo strategies
  • uk seo
  • multilingual seo
  • seo consultants
  • seo service
  • seo courses
  • seo links
  • seo australia
  • how to seo
  • seo chat
  • seo london
  • utah seo
  • consultant seo
  • seo houston
  • seo consultation
  • seo help
  • seo school
  • seo training

Google's AdWords keyword suggestion tool may make niche discovery easier by allowing you to see how Google views a variety of small niched sites or sites in other locations where slightly different language or dialects are used (think UK English versus US English).

As a content publisher, if you monetize via AdSense, the keywords Google suggest are great to target since you know they are pointing advertisers as them. The words seen by the widest number of advertisers are likely to be priced near or above their fair value.

PageRank Search Engine

While search has in many ways moved past raw PageRank scores there is a newish SEO tool called PRASE which allows you to grab the top search results from Google, Yahoo! and MSN and and then sorts them in order of PageRank. You can also set PageRank limits. One thing that sucks with the current tool is that it does not allow you to expand the depth to get any more than 10 results from any engine at one time.

Personally I would find the tool more interesting for hunting down high ranking low PageRank sites than to find high PageRank sites.

Via Text Link Brokers

Becoming a Scientific SEO

One of the best things I ever learned in the navy was troubleshooting and half splitting problems into smaller possible problems. I recently did a bit of microspamming stuff to see what would get nailed and what would not, although I have only tested like 0.0000001% of the market. I want to start focusing more of my efforts on learning how to become a scientific SEO.

I have not built a ton of for profit sites yet, but the likes of Andy Hagans and a few of my other friends have been wearing me down into becoming more of a blog overlord / many for profit site owner.

There are really two main ways to do SEO:

  • Manually: Create world class content that is published frequently.

  • Automated: Buy and/or build sites that look good to search algorithms and search reviewers even if they are a bit automated.

People tend to dismiss the word automation as meaning it has to be spam, but I can't tell you how many times I have heard people like Mikkel talk about how many of the most popular websites are heavily automated.

Google, Google News, Digg, and Memeorandum are a few of the many automated sites I generate on a daily basis. I also think it is pretty hypocritical for those creating automated websites to push the image of automation as being associated with spam.

I guess the ultimate goal to create a money printing machine would be to create content that is:

  • useful and value added (needs to pass the Turing Test and be citation, bookmark, and subscription worthy)

  • unique (so duplicate content filters do not catch it)
  • profitable
  • nearly 100% automated

I am pretty much starting from scratch on the above autogen idea, but friends have left me tips here and there. I hired a cool programmer who is working away at creating value added websites. It should be fun.

In some areas I am partnered with friends who are all about making money, but as much as anything I want to watch and understand how search evolves on many levels. You really can't be a true scientific SEO unless you have some automated content you are working with.

Inducing User Data for SEO

Mike Grehan replied to the wide array of public criticism he received from his latest ClickZ article. In his reply he mentioned that he thought SEO moved from keywords in content to linkage data and that it was moving from links to user data.

So long as you have a channel with decent reach I think it is easier to induce end user activity than it is to induce trusted link popularity. If search engines heavily go in that direction I am so in the money.

They may want to trust user data more because it is harder for web marketers to track user data streams than link popularity, and entry costs to gain influence - in time and/or effort - exceed what most people would be interested in spending.

Mike gave this example for inducing user data:

What about, we give away a discount coupon to everyone on our mailing list (which as a large company may be sizable).

But, instead of putting a link to a promotional web page on the site, we cut and paste a link for a search on Google for brand+product. And instead of using "click here to get your token" as the call to action, we use "Just Google us and click through for your coupon."

His article is top shelf (although his Blogger template is hosed it is still well worth the effort to read).

Some other ideas to induce user data:

  • write articles that are intentionally vague or easy to take in an offensive way such that it builds a controversy around your name

  • create contests or other ideas that have some shifty sounding rules to create controversy
  • hijack others news or ideas by turning them into a controversy to share in the limelight
  • if you see viral ideas spreading throw chips in early to try to ride it out
  • write posts about emerging social networks or publishing formats and business models, perhaps saying how new ones will kill old ones
  • be aggressive in writing about ideas that are spreading quickly
  • advertise everywhere to where your ads become so annoyingly overexposed that people end up writing about the topic
  • take the contrarian view
  • be outright offensive
  • get sued
  • create a new word or define the meaning to commonly used industry jargon
  • if you are a blogger use Technorati tags
  • add links to make it easy to tag your site (via Del.icio.us or Digg or Reddit)... I so need to get on the ball with that

A couple ideas I included in this blog for probably well over a year:

  • Search the Search Engines for "title of my page"

  • Buy the industry standard #1 ranked SEO Book. What do the search engines think? Google Search: SEO Book (#1)

One thing that is a bit of a let down is that most things that go really viral are typically ubber hyped. I like the idea of organic marketing, but the line between strong marketing and pure hype gets thin when one needs to be profitable in a competitive distributed network market...and I may eventually find myself heavily becoming a hype guy.

Not sure how much weight will end up being placed on user data or how heavily it will effect the phrase "you are not going to believe what I read today" but I am already using that phrase. ;)

Political Activism SEO

So spamming bathrooms isn't the only way to the top of the SERPs!

There is a lot of viral linkbait floating around the impeach Bush topic. If you make a political activism sign and take a picture of it you may get to express your opinion, tap a bit of that free link love, and Greg is offering free BOTW listings to boot.

I am sure posting this will get me some hate, but I am only posting this because it is worth noting that their is a lot of good link popularity easily passed around in the activism realm.

The Perfect Page Title for SEO and Users

Brett Tabke recently had a supporters thread about the page title element as part of his 101 Signals of Quality series.

In the post he:

  • talks about how some people overdo it or underdo it to make the title less appealing to potential site visitors and search algorithms alike.

  • gave examples not only of what pulled best from the search results, but also what words could be added to forum thread topic titles to keep conversations going.
  • talked about keyword value vs phrase length

One thing he did not talk about a lot is the effect titles have on viral link baiting. I think NickW is probably the best at titling link bait of anyone I have ever seen. The title not only acts as an ad to be clicked on but also as an ad to be part of a story worth spreading. If you can be early with stories or put interesting twists on them those skills can make it really easy to build link popularity.

All in all Brett's post kicked ass. With how much information he put in that post I am going to be interested in seeing how he creates 101 tip posts like that one.

Yet Another Google Sanbox Thread...

Search Engine Watch has another thread on the Sandbox concept.

Highlights...

Mike Grehan tends to think Sanbox is synonymous with garbage website, but much of his perspective may be biased by the size and quality of the clients he works worth.

Macia points out that she thinks usage data may matter, referencing this Google patent.

Andy Hagans writes about search results becoming more like the real world in how they learn to trust marketing and branding.

Jason D hints that the sandbox effect may not apply to all TLDs. Numerous friends have confirmed this with me.

Orion has a great post about researching the effects of site age on PageRank and relevancy.

In the next 6 months many of Google's algorithms will likely greatly shift away from trusting raw link popularity and domain / link age to go more toward rate of change.

Lots of good stuff in there. It's really worth a read for anyone interested in SEO.

NYT Links at Blogger Book Reviews

The NYT recently linked at some blogger book reviews of popular highly blogged books.

While it usually makes sense to stick on a niche sometimes talking about things that are popular across the web graph or related things that are highly community oriented makes it easy to get links.

The NYT blogger book review articles are lame though, becuase they did not mention any of my reviews ;)

Black Hat Getting Harder? or Requiring More Cover?

So I have been diligently reading my feeds, and came across a few ideas that are worth cross referencing. DaveN recently said:

DaveN also mentioned that he is starting to work on a search engine, and has been producing legit content...even posting niche channels with furry animal USB drives.

In a recent WMW supporters thread Brett Tabke said:

I count 15 independent blackhat SEO's that have went to work for other corporations. The actual number must be closer to 50 or 60 that have thrown in the towel and went to work for the man.

But Marcia added

If the newer breed of the SEO black arts involves link-based manipulation, how could anyone assume there wouldn't be a good degree of underground collusion involved?

Contextual advertising and easy blog related links are making niche channel content production a no brainer. Even if it was only self funding or moderately profitable a content network would still allow you the ability to help market anything in a hurry. Partner up with a few friends on the idea and you are talking about some serious link authority that can be shifted to and fro.

So long as it is scaled out in a logical manner I think many SEOs are going to start becoming large scale publishers of many niche networks.

Sure the blog hype might be overrated, but there is something to be said about having your own network which can be used to help launch newer sites. Content costs are usually a one time fee, and so long as your niche selection is smart within a year or so the revenues should be able to outpace the cost on most channels.

Many paid links may be a bit obvious to engines and discounted, but there is only so many links they can chose to ignore. If you have a legit network that does not blatantly sell links your link popularity and content base will likely be leveragable in more ways than you can count.

I think the SEO theme for 2006 is networks and friendships with network owners.

Pages