For Profit Websites Have No Value Until They Rank

May 10th

If you are passionate, a site can have value without ranking, as rankings are a lagging indication of site quality, market timing, and/or marketing savvy. If you are offering something that is substantially similar to competing sites, it has virtually no value until it ranks at the top of the results. In the quest to build value, mindshare, and rankings it is easy to focus on unimportant things that eat time and provide little return. For example, you could write a 3000 page website that is the encyclopedia for your topic or you could try to create the ultimate branded property, but if nobody sees it then the content or brand it doesn't flourish. You need the site to look good enough to compete, but there is little value is trying to make it perfect right out of the gate.

Brand Developement and Market Leverage

While one is writing page after page or tweaking away building a perfect new site, the competitors are leveraging Indian copywriters who write thin informational pieces wrapped in AdSense. Those same low quality sites garner self reinforcing links because they are already ranking, and most people are lazy, just linking to whatever they can easily find.

Premature Testing

The results of any tests to monetize a low traffic site are going to provide inadequate and inconclusive results, which also likely feed into your biases and expected outcomes. If you build authority first and then come back and test later you will receive a greater ROI for the amount of effort required to perform the tests.

To put into perspective the testing errors that small samples can create, a friend of mine has a site which makes virtually the same amount from AdSense every day. The same site sells leads. Some days it generates 6 conversions and other days it does 21, all while the traffic flow and AdSense earnings are fairly constant. If you compared one revenue stream to the other, the obvious winner would look different based on what day you chose.

Everything on the Web is Broken

If you try to look really polished that might not be remarkable. You are not cutting edge if you have to be perfect before you are willing to be seen. If I wasn't willing to release my first ebook prior to when I should have you probably would not be reading these words right now.

Everything on the Web is Biased

I believe people have more of a tendency to talk about and share things that are unpolished. Google gets talked about by getting sued, Digg gets talked about by getting gamed, Fox news gets talked about by entertainment sold as news, etc etc etc.

When you try to come out of the gate perfect, it is hard to relate to your end audience without spending thousands of dollars on marketing. It is far more remarkable to come out of the gate slightly broken and biased and appeal to the overt biases of those who can give you authority. I am not suggesting to be racist or sexist or anything like that, but people are generally more receptive to (and thus likely to share) things that reinforce their worldview. Appeal to a known bias, market that story, then create another story that works another group. Do it over and over until you have enough authority to clean up the site and become the market leader.

Rough edges appealing to deep niches is a far better approach to marketing than broad and polished to a fine dull.

In Summary...

Get authority by appealing to smaller groups of your audience, grab marketshare, THEN try to look authoritative. Most people don't know HOW you acquired your authority...it is not something most think to question, and if they do you can always change your look and feel as needed to accommodate the market.

You don't have to do anything deceptive to gain authority, but if you think perfect content is the answer you are only deceiving yourself.

Published: May 10, 2007

New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.

Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.

Already have an account? Login to share your opinions.

Comments

Adam Jusko
May 15, 2007 - 4:56am

It's a good thing for some of us that more people don't read you, Aaron. This is advice I have used on many sites but that I would never tell anyone who I thought might compete with me.

Patrick
May 10, 2007 - 12:15pm

"You don't have to do anything deceptive to gain authority, but if you think perfect content is the answer you are only deceiving yourself. "

I think that one is a common shared world-view, too. You could make a story of a site, that got a #1 ranking in no time because it has the best content (maybe in a uncompetitive niche for a 7 word search term) and the "content is king" folks would love to spread it.

here in Germany some people on Internet Marketing boards still believe you have to feed the Google bot content, content, content because CONTENT IS KING! and the more content, content, content the bot gets the higher your ranking because Google will like you more...

Keith
May 10, 2007 - 5:41pm

I have been at fault for ding exactly that. It is very frustrating putting in all that hard work and see "less reputable" content sites out rank you.

Ben
May 10, 2007 - 8:44pm

You know, this article describes my conflicts perfectly-how good is good enough?

I guess I have a tendency to err a little more on the polished side-because of it, my private SEO ventures are quite a bit less successful than my public (I work for a Fortune 500 company as an in-house SEO-what a brand to play with from an SEO perspective!) ones.

You have inspired me some, and I think I'll start developing a strategy for a few "less than polished" properties that I have out there.

Avo
May 10, 2007 - 10:37pm

You're absolutely right Aaron. I'm guilty of erring on the more polished and dull side. But it unfortunately makes sense. For example, which one of these headlines will get the most views?
"Record US Deficit Causes Dollar's Slide"
OR
"Is the Dollar Being Gamed by Asian Governments?"
I'd be willing to bet which of these headlines would get the most clicks and the most heated opinions, which goes to the core of what you're saying. Great post.

Uday Patel
June 21, 2007 - 1:31pm

Good "Optimized" Content is absolute must. It makes a major difference.
But as far as ranking is concerned ---there are so many factors that govern ranking. If your site SEO is missing on that then you will definately rank behind inspite of good content.

If your site SEO is to "T" but there is no optimized good informative keyword embeded content on site "Forget Ranking".

New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.

Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.

Already have an account? Login to share your opinions.

  • Over 100 training modules, covering topics like: keyword research, link building, site architecture, website monetization, pay per click ads, tracking results, and more.
  • An exclusive interactive community forum
  • Members only videos and tools
  • Additional bonuses - like data spreadsheets, and money saving tips
We love our customers, but more importantly

Our customers love us!






    Email Address
    Pick a Username
    Yes, please send me "7 Days to SEO Success" mini-course (a $57 value) for free.

    Learn More

    We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.