SEO Friendly Flash?

Jul 1st
Published: July 1, 2008

New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.

Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.

Already have an account? Login to share your opinions.

Comments

July 1, 2008 - 2:29pm

I'm afraid this announcement will just make the Flash inclined even more lazy about SEO. I remember a comment from a Yahoo! engineer a few years ago that they had been able to index Flash for some time, but that the content of Flash sites was so meager that it didn't really matter. From what I've seen this hasn't changed much.

July 1, 2008 - 3:38pm

I think there is a positive effect here, its nice to have the choice to out a flash menu or small banner without lossing ground completely seo wise.

July 1, 2008 - 3:43pm

Surely this will lead to a whole stack of blackhat flash techniques? Hidden text in Flash files - can Adobe's plug-in deal with that? Tiny flash files with loads of links, keywords, the works?

And how on earth do we, as SEOs find out why out competitors are ranking so highly when they have a blank page with a small blank flash movie on the page if we can't read it ourselves.

I foresee some hasty revisions going on before long!

July 1, 2008 - 7:43pm

While I see this as a positive step in some regards, I also see it potentially causing a lot of confusing for people who don't fully understand search.

Googlebot indexes pages, right? Pages have unique URLs, right, and unique title tags?

How many full-Flash websites do you see where the URL changes as you navigate from section to section? How about the title tag?

So what is Google going to index?

I've seen some sites using anchors to navigate Flash, which is perhaps the right way to do it in light of this new development. Slide shows within an HTML page will likely now be indexable. Anchors in Flash menus can perhaps be followed.

But building a site completely in Flash, whereby only one file loads and the URL/Title doesn't change as the user navigates, is still going to be a shot in the foot for anybody hoping to pick up a lot of search engine traffic.

Not to mention the usability issues...

July 7, 2008 - 12:24am

This improves the indexability of Flash, but Flash websites will continue to make it difficult for users to deep-link pages within an all-Flash site. These sites will still be ranking-impaired from a PageRank point of view.

July 9, 2008 - 8:42pm

What about XML copy- will this be crawled? in the same manner or is it only the embedded text?

A while ago I was playing with the SDK and while I could see that embedded text could be read if that text was in a movie clip (let's say a button that said "home") the text was repeated for each fraem of the movie clip. Having the word "Home" show up 15 times on one page could cause problems.

July 10, 2008 - 7:12pm

I suppose the word home will not hurt if there are other pieces of custom text on each frame.

New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.

Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.

Already have an account? Login to share your opinions.

  • Over 100 training modules, covering topics like: keyword research, link building, site architecture, website monetization, pay per click ads, tracking results, and more.
  • An exclusive interactive community forum
  • Members only videos and tools
  • Additional bonuses - like data spreadsheets, and money saving tips
We love our customers, but more importantly

Our customers love us!






    Email Address
    Pick a Username
    Yes, please send me "7 Days to SEO Success" mini-course (a $57 value) for free.

    Learn More

    We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.