I think social news sites should make all individual pages for news items noindex for that exact reason. If an item gets popular it'll get dozens or even hundreds of extra links from other blogs, I doubt that one less link would cause a huge problem.

But then that would probably result in lost ad revenue for sites like Digg that I would assume use a CPM model, they probably get a ton of traffic from Google and the others for those long tail items.

You have to respect DaveN AND Aaron Wall! Though I have been occasionally a bit aghast at remarks DaveN has made from the podium as well as face to face while less than sober...I must say he speaks his mind and reveals a termendous amount that is decidely insightful. I recently noticed the weather.com problem on page 2 SERP of DaveN's favorite search "Buy Viagra"...

Google is so spammy in areas it is shocking. C'mon Mr. Cutts... You are losing the battle and all of Google and possibly much of Web 2.0 may go down with you!?

Sorry if I am a bit slow but I follow all of the items that you (and daven) mentioned but I don't quite understand how people are using webstandards.org to funnel pagerank to their spammy sites.

Matt is busy chasing down relevant paid links to legitimate sites to worry about these kind of tactics ;)

Umm can you say Technorati?

Hi Johnnyfundae
If you look long enough there is a member's personal blog linked to where every post is PR6 or higher, and they are selling a bunch of sitewide outbound links as well.

I've noticed this too... its a massive problem and something that should be easily rectified. there is NO REASON Google should ever list another directory/search results page as they're too easy to detect i.e. does th content of this results page match MY OWN LISTING DOH!

The same goes for scraper sites that include Google results as content.

Very good post on Earners Blog illustrating what happens to a site when Google decides it is responsible for too much webspam (in this case, Squidoo):

http://www.earnersblog.com/squidoo-traffic-down/#more-382

I've seen the archives.org spam a lot too. Not good at all.