Seth is jealous of your site and I'm jealous that you interviewed Seth and I didn't.
Great work Aaron. You should do this more often... you ask great questions!
I recently interviewed Seth Godin. Seth is a well known marketing guru who's blog and books have helped me become a more holistic marketer. I read everything he writes. He also did a video interview on AuctionBytes recently.
Here is the interview:
By remarkable, I mean only, "worth making a remark about". So, if you want your idea to spread online, you only have three choices:
a. buy a lot of ads.
b. do really good SEO so that people who have already decided to search for what you have, find you
c. have the community that knows about you tell their friends, their blog readers, etc.
C, naturally, is a neat way to get to B. That's part of the genius of Google... that being remarkable is the easiest way to improve you Google ranking.
If what you sell is boring, it's probably because your organization WANTS it to be. Which is fine, but then you shouldn't expect fast growth or high Google ranking most of the time. They can make coffee and charity and political candidates interesting. Only by treating what you do as a commodity do you make it a commodity.
Authentic means that it's real, it's true, it holds up to scrutiny.
It means you don't have to check a script before you make a decision. Nice people do nice things, so if your story is "we're nice", it's a good idea to hire nice people!
And yes, of course, people are going to misunderstand your story. Happens all the time. But if you tell it long enough and consistently enough and in all the right places, sooner or later, your authentic story will sink in.
This is a great question. It deserves a great answer. I don't have one. For me, alas, it's intuitive. I worry that if I studied it, it would disappear.
A published book tells a story before it's even opened. A published book is about credibility and portability and substance. So, if you need those things--if it will help your idea, or your career, or help you to reach people in a different way, then yes, do it. But be prepared for it to take a year or more, and to not make you any money at all. (Not the book part, anyway).
I believe that in most cases, for most people, it's not necessary.
I also believe that in most cases, for most authors, a "real" publisher is not worth the hassle. It's very easy to 'self publish' a book that looks and feels just like a traditional one, and to sell it on Amazon just like a traditional one.
Actually, I was a successful book packager and an occasional and failed book publisher.
Publishing is truly difficult. It's about taking financial risks in a fundamentally broken business. Packaging, on the other hand, is a fantastic gig and I commend it to anyone who is creative and sleepless.
We have a semantic difference here. What you describe is totally in line with my thinking. I have never criticized that. My criticism has been reserved for two sides of one coin:
a. lazy companies that think they can buy web traffic by tricking search engines into sending them more traffic than they "deserve" by modifying sentences or code of their site without changing anything else, and
b. companies that will take money from these sites in order to do some mysterious thing for them.
Basically, I'm pushing people to dig deep, to work hard, to make stuff worth linking to.
I agree with you 100%. I think the good guys should change the name of what they do. Traffic Leverage or Engines of Revenue.
The challenge here is the game itself. As long as we define the game as doing something to a site that makes it worse for a human and better for a computer, it's always going to be dicey. I visited a site today that rents vacation homes. It was superclear from reading it that they had rewritten their site to be engine friendly. I have no idea if that part was successful, but I'm certain that it wasn't working on the humans.
The Republic of Tea, now out of print, but findable.
This is hard because if you mean "more than 20 years old" then it's got to be Hershey, because they had a remarkable product decades ago, they went to TV early and often at just the right time and they have great distribution today.
But of course, it's not the best marketed TODAY. If they keep up what they're doing, it'll just slide away.
So, what's the best marketed bar today? Well, if I describe "best" as fast-growing without a lot of investment (read: profitable) it might be Scharffen Berger. It might be Vosges, even though I don't know how to pronounce it.
People who
a. have an idea they want to spread
b. have an idea worth spreading
c. are willing to tell the truth
and
d. are willing to do in consistently, over time.
People who need to be in control over the flow of ideas, who are impatient and not willing to stick with it, and who can't tell a story. Those and the ones that try to sell us a line of bs.
Squidoo is a user-generated card catalog, a bunch of signposts in close proximity to each other, a way to find a few handpicked matches, not a million. Squidoo for the lensmaster is a place to point to your blog or your company or your organization. It's a place to assemble RSS feeds and links and stuff to buy. It's a cheap and fast way to increase links to sites that ought to get them.
For a surfer, it's more direct, more trusted and easier than a search engine in some ways. It's a place to start, a place to leave, and easy directory.
And for me, it's a way to raise a lot (I hope) of money for charity.
It's a great website. Everyone should read your book. I did. I'm glad I did. I'm jealous of your site.
They're selfish. They don't reflect the user experience. They're too slow. They're no fun. They don't get permission to followup. They're still no fun.
How much time do you have?
Offline, you get one conversation with a homogeneous and anonymous world.
Online, you get thousands of conversations with people you can learn about.
Do you mean how will media companies make more money by integrating the ads? I think they shouldn't. The yellow pages and google adwords are both the greatest ad mediums ever because every person using them KNOWS that they are ads. So advertisers get productive traffic. You can goose income for a while, but soon, advertisers will be able to tell the difference.
Book publishing is in trouble for a different reason (actually, more than one).
The guaranteed return policy at bookstores means that most, almost all, books lose money the glut (175,000 titles a year) of new titles makes it the noisiest market in the world and the big authors get huge advances, sucking much of the profit out.
There are doubtless very profitable niches, but the mainstream guys have troubles...
I haven't had one in forever, but I remember them being gooey, crisp, sweet, crunchy, soft, hot and proustian, all at once.
And then once, I ate six and had to stop, forever.
New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.

Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.
Already have an account? Login to share your opinions.
Seth is jealous of your site and I'm jealous that you interviewed Seth and I didn't.
Great work Aaron. You should do this more often... you ask great questions!
Thanks Brian
I cut back on the interviews because I got burned out on doing too many of them and because everyone started doing 12 interviews a week.
It is hard trying to be unique in a hypersaturated field while trying to stay profitable and keep on learning. Success has came a bit quicker than I would have expected (ie: I never thought I would be able to interview Seth!).
I might do more interviews again soon. Thanks for liking this one :)

That's a sweet interview Aaron, nice job. Maybe you could rename your book: "Engines of Revenue"? :) That's not a bad name for a book on SEO actually.
Yes, Aaron's questions were clever, but Seth appeared a bit lazy to provide deeper answers. Nevermind, interviews on this site are among items I like to read most here. Good work!
I think Seth is probably far more overworked than lazy.
Rarely does a person get to his level of success and yet remain so accessible.
The fact that he had the time to answer at all is cool to me. I also think one of his strengths is the ability to clearly communicate without needing to try to be verbose. Thats a good thing to be good at, IMHO.
Congrats for landing the interview. Though you might let Seth off a bit too easily regarding Squidoo.
Many would have probably done the same if they got the opportunity for the interview so no gripes there. But I thought more comparisons could have been made about Squidoo's "lens concept" to many of niche web marketing that are out there.

Very good interview Aaron, thanks. The Republic of Tea - on to my reading list.
"The Republic of Tea - on to my reading list".
Ditto. Great interview, Aaron.
Great to see Seth interviewed - and not only that, some good questions raised, and correspondingly good answers, too. :)
Arron; I enjoyed the interview and appreciate the update of your book. I have to ask if there is a way to find out what vacation home rental site Seth was reffering to as that is what I do.
Thanks,
Matthew
Hi Matthew
I don't think it is worth pointing out 1 specific site when so many of them are so bad on so many levels.
How many people think that creating content worth linking to is really enough? I think an idea from Purple Cow that needs to be mentioned in the same breath is that it works for industries that people talk about.
For example I have a new site on dating cultures with some very interesting content. But the people who I think should care about that (Sociology professors) don't care. They haven't updated their university web pages this century and they probably don't plan to.
On the other hand, my dad has a photo blog of antique cars. He has lots of links and 1500 people a day and while I do his SEO, I can't take any credit. I don't even know most of the sites linking to him.
I guess what I'm saying is car people talk about new sites while sociologists don't. So the linkable content idea works better with car sites.
Hi James
I totally agree with you. It is the same way with many of the colleges that still have links to search engine submission services, but rarely link to any news sources outside of the mainstream press, Search Engine Watch, and occassionally Search Engine Guide.
Ideas which surround active discussion are of course going to be easier to spread than those which don't. I think dating and human interaction is such a broad spectrum that if you are creative there should be MANY ways to get the attention of people and have them talk about your site.
The dating site's content was designed to appeal to academics. I'm sure it will interest others, but I don't know them...
Sounds like it would be worth it to broaden your scope or research the market then James.
It is a mistake to create something and say it has to fit a certain group. If a group is disinterested then sometimes you can only get their attention by telling them to screw off and then let them chase you AFTER you have become successful and your meme has spread through other channels / networks / etc.
New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.

Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.
Already have an account? Login to share your opinions.



Visit PPC Blog, our new sister site focused on pay per click marketing.
Join our training program today and get the Google rankings, search traffic, growth, and profits you deserve!
Not convinced? Try our free 7-day course for beginners. After viewing it we hope to see you join our community! Best of luck growing your business & we hope our site helps increase your rankings!
In Short? We offer the #1 SEO training program. And it comes with tools, videos, a private member's forum, and so much more.

