Interview of Frank Schilling, the World Famous Domain Investor

Having coined the term domain investor, Frank Schilling is a recognized leader in the domaining field. He talks about domaining on his blog at Seven Mile.com

I recently asked Frank Schilling if he would be up for an interview and he said sure.

What makes domain names so powerful from an investment standpoint?

Several things.. When you build on a domain name you are the master of your destiny because you are not beholden to anyone else's platform. It's the Internet comparison to owning the building vs. leasing from a landlord. Internet law is new and undefined. Google and Ebay can be brutal landlords changing rules or algorithms that put you back out on the street without notice. If you own a powerful generic name or name phrase; you will get internet traffic independent of what the search engines and auction marketplaces try to do to you.

Why are [secondary market] .com's typically so much more expensive than other extensions?

Dot com's are the most readily understood domain extension. They are so powerful even my daughter knows what they are (she's 3) .. Many people will simply append the subject matter they seek with '.com' in their address bar, expecting to find products and services that match the generic keywords they entered. That world-wide mindshare has been reinforced since the very beginnings of the Internet via trillions of dollars in collective global marketing and serve to create a premium value for the extension. The marketing that you, I and others have done, has served to make .com the first extension most of us try in the browser's address bar.

Have you ever sold a domain name for a loss?

No. Even names where folks scoffed saying I overpaid at the time, look cheap in hindsight.

What is the best domain you regret not purchasing?

Cameras.com sold for 1.5 million.. That was a really tasty one.. I chickened out over a million. Wish I could get in the Delorean and go back in time on that one. Also Food.com sold to the food network in a San Francisco bankruptcy court in 2003. it went for $300,000 ish .. I should have bid 500k back then.

Is it too late to get into domaining? If you were starting today which model would you go after? Would you try to buy a few strong domains or try to own a much larger portfolio of weaker ones?

I think there are so many untapped opportunities here.. Within a few years, hundreds of thousands globally are going to be directly employed in this industry. It is early not late. This is like California in the 1960's. -- yes, it's not the 1920's anymore, but there are still mountains of untapped opportunity. I would probably focus on buying and selling, flipping up and bootstrapping profits back into the business if I had to start today. Also SEO and PPC keyword arbitrage.

Are new heavily marketed extensions like .tv or .mobi a good opportunity?

Only to flip.. If you can get something good cheaply and sell it to somebody else then do it, but I am avoiding those extensions completely. I like .com, .net, .org and the CCtld of the Country you are in because the name spaces are established, the renewal fees are certain (consistent/predictable) and because that's where the organic, generic intent type-in traffic is.

What are your favorite cities to visit? How does real estate there compare with domain name prices?

I like Los Angles and Las Vegas a lot. It's funny because those cities real estate histories have parallels to the domain industry. In Southern California you have Irvine where one man basically acquired millions of acres through the early 1900's and then sold to a large corporation in the later 1900's. Today the seller looks like a fool because he sold so cheap when viewed against the development which has occurred in the surrounding area. Yet had he not sold, none of the roads, utilities, infrastructure would be there, so the area would not really be as valuable. So if there is a comparison between domains and real estate, I think "development naturally follows acquiring the land" and "prices increase as the people come in" are the two over-riding factors.

If I am planning on developing a site, and am working with a small budget, do you think it is better to buy the .com, or to buy a .net or .org and spend the difference on more marketing and development? What about country level domains?

I like Country Code domains in Countries that have even-handed registration rules which allow all all sorts registrants to invest and develop there. Country codes I like include .CA (Canada), .co.uk (UK), .de (Germany), .br (Brazil), .cn (China), .in (India). In many circumstances Country Codes are stronger than .com. There are a host of reasons for this including currency issues, language, nationalism. I would always try to get the .com because it helps you to build traffic outside of the search-engines (everybody winds up at the .com eventually). I do like .nets and .orgs when they are priced low enough.

Years down the road when all the best names are gone and many of them are beyond the budgets of individuals and small businesses do you see outlier names like .info, .biz, or .cc getting any traction?

I do not.. I think it will be .com, .net, .org and the CC TLD of the Country Code you live in, ten years from now. If the Web extension gets approved, it could eventually unseat .net but it would take time to catch on. That forecast is assuming names get rolled out in their current way. The only other thing that could change destiny is the wholesale addition of hundreds of new extensions such as .GOOG, .MSN, .IBM, .YHOO, where every company got its own extension. It's problematic because corporate jealousy precludes adding just one or two.. and companies can barely manage their names, let alone an entire GTLD. It would take a generation to roll out and would ultimately strengthen .com relating to generic words such as Maps, Books, Shopping etc.. So while I find that kind of wholesale change revolutionary (ICANN and Verisign would resist it), it still 'could' happen.. and that would change to weaken .net and .org.

If I'm planning on developing a site when is it best to buy the core related keyword domain? When does it make more sense to create a unique word or add a common word like "hub" or "community" to the name to get an $8 domain name instead of spending thousands more for the exact match domain?

You can focus on building a great company without a great name. I like generic word + 'hub' or 'web' or 'world' style domain names. But if you build the world's biggest ceiling fan company at fanhub.com and then you want to acquire ceilingfans.com .. it is going to get much more expensive as time goes by. Names like those are going to be worth millions one day, so the time to acquire them is when they seem cheapest and unimportant to you. That's always the best time to acquire great names btw.

Are there any good $8 domain names available right now?

Yes.. but mining for them is getting harder. I don't buy anything in the available space anymore.. haven't in a long time. Too time intensive and "domain tasting" has creamed off most of the generic defensible undiscovered names.

How many ways do you categorize domains? What types of domains are the best from an investment perspective?

We have 60 main categories such as 'cars' and then 1600 subcategories including 'car accessories', 'towing', 'insurance'. etc. The best domain-names are generic defensible keyword-style (one two and three word) phrases which get some trickle of organic generic-intent type-in traffic; for nothing more than the keyword-weight, gravity and resonance of the generic words that make up the domain name.

What are your favorite spots for buying domains right now? Which auction do you like the best? What changes would you like to see to how domain names are auctioned off?

We are going through a seasonal dry-spell at the moment.. There is still an annual echo effect of expiring domain names which results from the dot-com bust where millions of folks in 2001,2,3 let their domain names expire.. the expiring name echo-period runs from November through April, so we are in the quiet season at the moment. I like Snapnames, Enom, BuyDomains, Godaddy. The auctions are presently run by for-profit clearing houses which inject themselves between expiring names and bidder registrants. One day ICANN will probably get involved auctioning new names like the FCC does with reissued airwave licenses.

What percent of domain sales do you estimate are publicly known?

About 5%.. maybe less. I was at my daughter's friend's birthday party recently and the father of one of the children confided that he sold a terrible made up brand-like sounding name for $23,000 (it was either 23 or 33k.. can't quite recall) This guy was not a domainer.. you would never hear about the sale. I get folks from regular walks of life coming up to me all the time confiding that they are part time domainers.. These are folks who have never visited a domain chat room, have never visited another domain site. Their only connection to the industry is through their registrar. It is a billion dollar business.

Many domains tend to sell for a multiple of PPC earnings. In 10 years time do you think the baseline will move to some other metric?

It already has.. No good domain portfolio has changed hands since BuyDomains and that business would have sold for considerably more than the rumored amount had the company's former owner been engaged in selling advertising alone, vs selling his names. Prior to that there was Name Development's sale to Marchex (Yun Ye transaction). No large, high-quality portfolios have changed hands since. Other sales have been smaller or split-portfolios consisting of good names interspersed with trademark issues. Individual names often sell for 100 years PPC.. No high quality domainer would dream of selling a portfolio worth potential billions to a third party for 10-12X PPC revenues. PPC is a flawed multiple because it works off a rev-share. If you buy a portfolio for 10X and it is on a 50/50 rev share (after 'cost of services' through Google Adsense) that means you sold your portfolio for 5X what Google could make with it. Maybe 3X if you exclude the amount Google shaves for smart pricing. That is so insanely cheap. Only a fool would give names away like that. If I were selling I would pick a walk away number (the youtube style multiple) or I would sell names individually. The breakup value of large portfolios will be in the billions if they aren't already.

You have mentioned that you thought search was promoting too many anchor stores vs smaller boutique websites. Do you think this creates an opportunity for other search players or adds value to topical community resources? Do you see it becoming more or less profitable to make niche websites and domain names?

I think of every domain name as an alternative search engine under the keyword embodied within the name. Search-engines by their nature can only display 5 to 10 results above the fold. As markets get more competitive that 11th result will become a different website, with a greater frequency. It's always getting harder for search engines to rank the top results.. as that competition intensifies as domain implementations get better, the domain name becomes a more viable alternative browsing experience. It's going to become much more profitable to run boutiques that sell things in the years ahead because software, fulfillment, products are all becoming cheaper as marketing costs go up. A good domain name reduces your lifetime marketing costs and increases marketing opportunities.

Are you concerned with large web companies claiming certain websites and types of websites as being unsafe to end users?

It depends how far they take it. Clearly I'd be concerned if browsers incorrectly claimed that advertising was bad and tried to block all sites with ppc ads.. While that wouldn't impact my lifestyle it would stymie newcomers and limit folks abilities to browse the web. I think the browsers are already on thin ice with a lot of the error search stealing to the right of the dot.. type your favorite website with .xom or .con watch where you go, think about where you were intending to go. That's stealing in the browser. It's unseemly to see that kind of conduct coming from a major US Corporation. I think in time there will be more freedom of navigation not less. Users (by their nature) want to be free. So to answer your question, there are probably too many sites with advertising on them for the browsers to do something draconian or to limit browsing freedoms. People would type in a website and say the internet's broken, my browser won't let me go anywhere .. too many sites would be impacted.

As the web gets more competitive, I believe any single sign of quality will likely have less of an overall effect on a website's position on the web. Do you believe that is true for domain names as well, or will everything being so gamed only increase the value of domain names?

I think probably the later.. Mark Twain said: "History doesn't repeat but it rhymes" .. The past may not be a true indication of the future, but domain names 'are the Internet'. You need a domain for email, in fact the only constant since the dawn of the commercial internet in 1993 (Netscape 1) has been the domain name. If you feel comfortable investing in anything related to the Internet it should be a generic domain name.

What makes Riesling so good?

I was picking up dinner at www.pappagallo.ky they have this new house wine from Germany.. very light refreshing.. good lunch wine. Darn, can't remember the name - Maybe if it ended in .com! :)

----

Thanks Frank. Check out Frank's blog to read his latest insights on the domain market.

Published: May 18, 2007 by Aaron Wall in interviews

Comments

dotsorg
July 17, 2007 - 10:32pm

For all of you looking for expired domains , try
www.dots.org , we have sophisticated algorithm which find very valuable two word combinations (e.g. mydomain.com) like Frank was saying...

ganesh
August 7, 2007 - 3:11pm

its very nice interview ......

i too started the part time domain buying

Patrick
May 18, 2007 - 12:22am

I think here in Germany around 80% of type-in traffic are .DE domains. Wouldn't be surprised if it was similar in France with their .fr-tld.

David Kubicka
May 18, 2007 - 12:29am

Awesome interview. Now I'm all stoked on domaining. SEO is burning me out.

LG
June 9, 2007 - 4:50am

Kick butt interview. Thanks.

Needs some advice... I have over 200 .coms that I am holding for a project. They get natural traffic but I do not have them setup for making money, meaning, a PPC type program.

Can someone write back with the easy way to start this or a good link to go to.

Thanks
LG

Deano
May 18, 2007 - 12:37am

Any thoughts on the .eu extension?

valik
May 18, 2007 - 1:44am

Missed one question:
Where do you sell them? Selling at auctions is a rip off. Anyone has any ideas? Thanks.

May 18, 2007 - 2:20am

Hi Deano
Frank posted on .eu here.

Europe has started two world wars because of nationalism. You are going to get a .de from the Germans or a .fr from the French when you pry them from their cold dead hands. My neighbor in Cayman is Italian.. She still converts things in Lira even though the Euro has been around for nearly a decade. People are proud of their national heritage in Euroland and the domain extension tells folks the language they can expect to find at each destination.

Hi Valik
I don't believe Frank does much selling as of yet, but if domains have great ressonance people will come across them and make offers for them.

Sahar Sarid
May 18, 2007 - 2:28am

Great questions. Thanks for the interview.
Sahar

Andrew Johnson
May 18, 2007 - 2:46am

Excellent, one of the best interviews I've ever read.

Jordan
May 18, 2007 - 4:42am

Aaron,

Great Interview! Great questions and more importantly thank you for sharing.

Bob Sheth
May 18, 2007 - 12:19pm

Hi Aaron,
Great interview. Thanks. It kind of re-inforces one of the larger acquistions I have recently made. I wanted to start a community forum for Expats. I had the choice of registering some mediocre domains or going for what I think is the real cream - www.ExpatForum.com.

I ended up paying in the low $xx,xxx region for the name. Most people think I'm mad. I believe that when the site is successful then the name will have amazing brand value power behind it.

I think ShoeMoney puts it so well when he says to always "Plan for success"...

Kevin
May 18, 2007 - 2:48pm

Great Interview. Great timing for me too, I'm actually in talks with purchasing a few domains for my business - what I consider more "premium level" domains that have some type-in value and niche keyword specific. One of which wanted 5 figures but after doing a domain appraisal with Sedo.com, the number came in much lower. How accurate do you find these domain appraisal tools? Do these take into account future potential value? I am offering more than the appraised value but not in the 5 figure realm that was wanted... we'll see where we end up with that.

Cygnus
May 18, 2007 - 4:28pm

Riesling? Aaron, say it ain't so.

When you come to Phoenix, I'll get you and your girlfriend drinking real wine. :)

Joe

Barman
May 18, 2007 - 6:18pm

Great interview!

AhmedF
May 18, 2007 - 7:14pm

Kevin - a domain is worth whatever someone is willing to pay. Those appraisal tools are nothing but bullshit.

I remember being hammered for paying $5k for blogtopsites.com - if the domain will make things easier for you (to the level of $xx,xxx) - then buy it.

Dawie
May 18, 2007 - 8:59pm

"Are there any good $8 domain names available right now?"

Even though 50 million .com domain names are registered, I believe that you can still find good domain names. A service like GrabaGoodDomain (http://grabagooddomain.com) uses people to think of creative domain names and suggests available ones.

MyZine.com
May 19, 2007 - 6:08am

Kevin - appraisal tools are bullshit and make no sense Just follow your guts

Great Interview

Myzine.com
Share Video, Photo & More..

Vijith
May 30, 2007 - 1:20pm

Great interview. especially for a newbie like me....

Chad
May 19, 2007 - 6:51am

Great interview. Definitely a must-read.

August 30, 2007 - 2:06am

Fantastic interview. It blew my mind when Frank said that generic dot coms can sell for 100 years earnings.

May 19, 2007 - 8:48am

Dawie: Dont forget, there is pickydomains.com :)

Ravi Venkatraman
May 19, 2007 - 6:33pm

Great Interview.

All other things being equal between 2 sites.
The advantage of using a Keyword domain is 3 fold.
1) Gets Type-in traffic
2) Better Search engine listing for the keyword, both specific and long tail
3) Better CTR & Lower pricing for the keyword in the relevency based PPC's like Google Adwords and Yahoo-Panama.

Dave Starr --- ...
May 21, 2007 - 2:18am

Very rewarding interview. I seldom read through anything like this becuase it is so often fluff ... this one has some real meat an dis very informative.

My own cut regarding the ccTLD's ... their type-in use and value will vary significantly from country to country. I know that .de, as already mentioned, is very widely used within Germany. But I have a Canadian business associate who has his comapny's "brochure" type site on www.hiscompany.com and www.hiscompany.ca His "brick and mortar" market is about 70/30 US/CA, but his traffic on the web site is more than 90/10 .COM/.CA

Add new comment

(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.