This is a great look into another possible filter. I need to add this to my google's filter list.
Thanks aaron!
If something ranks and it shouldn't, why not come up with a natural and easy way to demote it? What if Google could come up with a way to allow scrapers to actually improve the quality of the search results? I think they can, and here is how. Non-authoritative content tends to get very few natural links. This means that if it ranks well for competitive queries where bots scrape the search results it will get many links with the exact same anchor text. Real resources that rank well will tend to get some number of self reinforcing unique links with DIFFERENT MIXED anchor text.
If the page was ranking for the query because it was closely aligned with a keyword phrase that was in the page title, internal link structure, and is heavily represented on the page itself that could cause the page to come closer and closer to the threshold of looking spammy as it picks up more and more scraper links, especially if it is not picking up any natural linkage.
New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.

Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.
Already have an account? Login to share your opinions.
This is a great look into another possible filter. I need to add this to my google's filter list.
Thanks aaron!
While this would probably work, wouldn't it be easy then to exploit? I mean how tough would it be to scrape your competitor's site a ton of times?
Also, why does Google need to introduce another measure that webmasters need to protect themselves from? Why should I need to change the titles of my pages? If it's not broken, don't fix it. Although with the way Google's been headed lately, it wouldn't surprise me to see them break another thing that I end up having to fix.
The goal is to make it hard to have reliable profit streams without creating real value. It forces you to either keep learning how to exploit holes in the system and keep protecting yourself from those who do, or it forces you to keep creating and sharing value, which increases the value of using Google.
They are thinking / hoping most people will opt for the later of those.
If SEO is too complex to explain and too expensive to implement in a reliable, meaningful, predictable, and measurable way Google would be happy.
I would imagine the latest algorithm tweaks to counter Googlebombing fit in with the nature of this post, particularly in regards to mixing up your anchor text.
I am thinking that the Google Bombing algorithm (as well as what Aaron has described) can and will hit relatively unpopular websites, who only have few content published on other sites (and which have the same anchor text, pointing at them).
Aaron,in some way we cannot use scraper for easy links?If we do this is black hat SEO?
You can use scrapers for easy links, but they don't have to count those links, and if your ratio of bad links to good links is too high then it might hurt your ability to rank, as noted in the above post.
New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.

Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.
Already have an account? Login to share your opinions.



Visit PPC Blog, our new sister site focused on pay per click marketing.
Join our training program today and get the Google rankings, search traffic, growth, and profits you deserve!
Not convinced? Try our free 7-day course for beginners. After viewing it we hope to see you join our community! Best of luck growing your business & we hope our site helps increase your rankings!
In Short? We offer the #1 SEO training program. And it comes with tools, videos, a private member's forum, and so much more.

