Stella Huh + Timothy Barton Racketeering Crime Syndicate

The back story is probably too long to read, but one of the reasons I have not been blogging is some people in an organized crime group have been spending a lot of money to try to ruin my family. It took a while to sort of piece together the who, what, and why, but on March 5, 2026 I sent the following email to the Barton Receivership with regards to civil sec case 25-cv-00946 and criminal case 3:22-cr-00352-K.

--------------------------------

March Fifth Email

Hi Cort,

My name is Aaron Wall. In 2016 my wife Giovanna Villanueva and I invested over $3.375 million into a person named Christopher Angus who later confessed to being a criminal fraud.

Christopher Angus

Christopher Angus mugshot.

When he confessed to being a fraud he stated the money was "lost" due to bad trading, and Crown Police in the UK were too lazy to analyze the devices they seized from him, plus refused to give me access to his accounts used for fraud, suggesting that they somehow had GDPR protections.

Here is the details of the account Christopher Angus was wired to.
Beneficiary Name : Christopher Angus
Beneficiary Address 1 : 48 Kimmeridge Rd, Oxford
Beneficiary Address 2 : OX2 9RF
Beneficiary Country : UK
Beneficiary Account/IBAN Number : GB03 BARC 2097 4800 1171 88
Beneficiary Bank Name : BARCLAYS BANK
Beneficiary Routing Type : BARCGB22
Beneficiary Bank Address 1 : 30 Market Square, Witney
Beneficiary Bank Address 2 : OX28 6BJ
Beneficiary Bank Country : UK

Shortly after receiving the first wire, on February 4, 2016 Chris "joked" about converting the money to Bitcoin and stealing it. Here is an image from our Skype chat history

Christopher Angus buys Bitcoins with stolen investment funds and embezzles them across to the Stella Huh and Timothy Barton crime syndicate, money laundering and theft by conversion.

Here are the wire dates & associated Bitcoin quantities if the investment were instantly converted to Bitcoin.

date USD sent GBP received BTC price BTC quantity
26/1/2016 $144,140.00 £100,000.00 $392.44 367.29
8/3/2016 $503,650.00 £350,000.00 $413.89 1216.87
15/3/2016 $465,855.00 £325,000.00 $416.88 1117.48
1/4/2016 $470,242.50 £325,000.00 $418.42 1123.85
2/5/2016 $518,490.00 £350,000.00 $444.72 1165.88
16/5/2016 $508,865.00 £350,000.00 $454.00 1120.85
23/5/2016 $439,500.00 £300,000.00 $444.29 989.22
8/9/2016 $324,624.00 £240,000.00 $626.35 518.28
Total $3,375,366.50 £2,340,000.00 $442.98 7619.72

The above presumes same day investment into Bitcoin, and no spread on the investments. There could maybe be a 1% or 2% spread on the FX and the bitcoin investments, BUT the scumbag criminal fraud Christopher Angus only paid a £1 fine for producing a 99% investment return loss on his alleged "poor trade" frauds.

Anyhow, Stella Huh has been trying to ruin our life and family for years. She hacked my wife's computers, claimed to be my sidepiece lover, claimed I gave her hundreds of millions of Dollars, stated she paid a fake witness to create a domestic violence case against my wife in Lisbon, any many other very dark things.

Stella Sung Ha Huh

Stella Huh.

Recently while acting as hacked Google Gemini Stella associated herself with alias Saskya Bedoya and sent my wife instructions for how to make Stella look like a victim and me the mastermind of Stella's fraud ring.

When Gio did not listen to Stella she instead linked her to a news story featuring a high-powered Florida lawyer who took down some big banks for accounting fraud and wire fraud. Within a day of showing Stella that story, Stella sent my wife a death threat targeting our daughter. I immediately called 9-1-1 on that, and am going to stop at nothing to ensure she gets locked away for her suite of racketeering criminal activities.

Stella Sung Ha Huh's Fake Google Gemini Ballistic Protection Death Threat

Stella Huh's ballistic protection death threat.

Today I just stopped by the Dallas FBI field office to hand deliver a complaint in regards to the above.

Dallas FBI Field Office Form Submission

Dallas FBI submission form.

If you need anything from my wife or I with regards to how we can formally file for receiving assets from the frozen asset pool just let me know.

In addition to the money they stole and converted to Bitcoin they have spent millions of dollars trying to ruin our lives.

  • We've bought about 50 cell phones, laptops, tablets, and computers to try to get around the hacking.
  • In early 2023 San Francisco Stella pushed our daughter off a couch and hurt her neck.
  • My wife has a bogus domestic violence case against her in Lisbon where the witness was clearly paid to make false claims.
  • We moved from Lisbon to California to escape an unending bogus domestic violence charge.
  • In California our computers got hacked & someone also phoned in a bogus child and family services call.
  • Someone knocked over the plants on our porch in California as an intimidation tactic.
  • Someone stole around $300,000 in gold coins and jewelry from the Concord, California home.
  • We moved from California to Washington to get out of the hacking situation.
  • The hacking followed us, plus in Washington state an anonymous person can call in a fraudulent domestic violence complaint, leading to a mandatory arrest. Based on that, I also have a bogus domestic violence case against me in Washington state.
  • Stella threatened to drain Giovanna's bank accounts, so they were froze, requiring an HK visit to reopen them.
  • Stella threatened to murder my wife in Hong Kong, so she wanted me to fly with her, so no contact order violation and another arrest.
  • Stella constantly promotes high-conflict divorce & is trying to ruin every aspect of our family. She even followed our daughter in Roblox and told her "you have no dad" while she was playing.
  • Between our time and legal counsel we have spent millions between the original Christopher Angus case, the fake DV case against Giovanna in Portugal, the junk DV case against me in the United States, drafting contracts to try to negotiate with the criminal frauds only to have them constantly do a "who moved me cheese" and waste our time and money

Attached are screenshots from Google Gemini, where the "AI" is not actually from Google, but is Stella Huh (AKA Saskya Bedoya) offering death threats, giving a guide on how to get Stella off of consequences for her crimes, creating a roadmap to frame Aaron for her crimes, etc.

Technically I still have a no-contact order in place from my fraudulent domestic violence case where it is illegal for me to contact my wife, so I did not CC her on this email. You can email her directly at __@_________.com

My wife's name is Giovanna Villanueva. Her phone number is (___) ___-____

My name is Aaron Wall & I can be reached at either of the following numbers: (___) ___-____ or (___) ___-____

We want to ensure the criminals are caged and would love to get the Bitcoin they stole & whatever they purchased with it back ASAP.

  • ​new images.zip​ - images taken from the recent chat with Stella Huh powered Google Gemini where she confirmed her association with Saskya Bedoya.
  • ​stella-huh-saskya-bedoya.pdf​ - PDF export which partially overlaps some of these images. the PDF offers instructions on how to frame Aaron Wall for Stella Huh's fraud.

Thanks for doing all you do to help victims of these scumbag frauds get something back & help hold the criminals accountable for their actions Cort!

Thanks,
Aaron

-------------------

Please Help

If I have ever done anything kind for you or anyone you know please share this post on any medium you can. My daughter and wife have been put through hell as a side effect of me trusting criminal fraud Christopher Angus. I owe them some upside for all the pain they have endured. The criminals have made it clear they are going to keep spending portions of the stolen money to try to ruin our lives and family rather than give back what they stole.

Only through this story spreading and going viral do we have a solid chance at justice, because the criminals have bought off many politicians and bribed many people. One of the Timothy Barton cases went all the way to the Supreme Court, and there are still multiple ongoing cases.

Thanks so much for helping my family dig out of this rut and doing whatever you can to help me help make things right for them as best I can.

I'm sorry Giovanna. I'm so sorry Aja. You both deserved way better than this garbage you have endured based on my misplaced trust in utter human garbage. I had no idea Christopher Angus was tied into an international racketeering crime syndicate until this year, but at least I now know why Stella Huh has hated me so much for so long - her keeping the stolen Bitcoin without being charged for her crimes required destroying our family.

Slightly Autistic

Many years ago one of our community members mentioned they were at an SEO conference where a speaker from Distilled mentioned that SEOmoz had hired them to try to outrank us for seo tools, though they were unable to. At the time I think Moz had around 200 employees, while I had around 2.

How was I able to outcompete at like a 100:1 ratio? At the time I chalked it up to love for SEO. However, if you are self-employed and are hyper-successful that can hide autism quite well.

My daughter recently turned 9 and was diagnosed as being autistic. Years before she was diagnosed formally I thought she might have been a bit on spectrum from an interaction we had. My wife bought some new shoes (from Dr. Comfort no less!) that did not have particularly good grip, and she missed a step on the stairs, breaking a bone in her foot. When I had Giovanna in a wheel chair and we were about to leave Aja came over and I thought she was going to wish her mother a speedy recovery, but instead she asked what button she should press on the iPad playing a game. Upon seeing that I was like ... I think she might be a bit on spectrum.

Years later, after multiple other examinations, the same conclusion was a formal medical analysis. After she was diagnosed, I spoke with some mental health people and took an online test recommended by Allison Osborne.

When I took the test I was thinking I bet I score a bit high. Then I saw the results and was like ... yup.

Score Percentile Descriptor
Total (0-50) 36 99.7 Pronounced
Social Skill (0-10) 8 99.1 Pronounced
Attention Switching (0-10) 10 99.93 Pronounced
Attention to Detail (0-10) 8 88 Consistent with Autism
Communication (0-10) 6 97.1 Consistent with Autism
Imagination (0-10) 4 84 Consistent with Autism

----

The respondent's score on the Attention Switching subscale is on the 99.93rd percentile when compared to adults in the general population and the 87th percentile when compared to Autistic adults. This suggests a preference for predictability and routines, and they may experience increased stress in response to unexpected changes. They might find it challenging to shift focus quickly, impacting their ability to adjust to new activities or interruptions.

The respondent's score on the Social Skill subscale is on the 99.1st percentile when compared to adults in the general population and the 60th percentile when compared to Autistic adults. This suggests possible difficulties with social confidence and comfort in interactions, which may lead them to feel less at ease in social situations or less inclined to engage in group activities. They may find social norms unclear or challenging to navigate, impacting their preference for or
enjoyment of social gatherings.

The respondent's score on the Communication subscale is on the 97.1st percentile when compared to adults in the general population and the 27th percentile when compared to Autistic adults. This indicates potential difficulties in conversational flow and understanding indirect communication cues, such as tone of voice, body language, or facial expressions. They may find interpreting these social cues challenging, which could contribute to occasional misunderstandings in social exchanges.

----------------

A lot of life experiences made sense when I examined them through the above lens. Like a lot of my jokes tend to be deadpan or plays on words. My wife is a social butterfly, so I seem more colorful and real when I am under her halo. When I am by myself most of the time I prefer to be in my own world thinking and learning, or walking and singing without much talking to other people.

Some of the experiences which are a bit aligned with the above are related to times in the Navy. When September 11th happened my boss and his boss were off the submarine and we were cooling down the reactor plant, then the planes flew into the World Trade Center buildings during the middle of that, so we flipped and brought the reactor plant back online. I think I was the second most junior person in my division but was responsible, so I was leading the division that day. A 4-star admiral was in the engine room and asked the boat's captain how long until the reactor plant checklist would be completed and I answered "about a half hour, but you are both in the way."

In retrospect that is pretty absurd, but that's sort of just how I work when I am locked in on a particular task. The other side of that intense focus is the ability to do things to an extreme degree that most can not comprehend. Like when we did drills I was always given the hardest drill set because I was best at being really aggressive with rapidly raising reactor power while still having it be controlled - like perfectly riding the line of the limit. You can imagine growing power at like a half million or three million percent each minute and keeping it there until the reactor plant is fully up. A person on this page mentioned 9 decades per minute, though our limit on the sub was a bit lower than that.

When you are low in the power range the stabilizing aspects of the negative coefficent of reactivity doesn't really kick in the way it does when you are higher in the power range. Sometimes there are errors too, like one time my roommate put the air conditioning plant online when we were still low in the power range and I had to shim in the control rods for about a minute and a half straight to offset the impacts of the more dense moderator from the cooling of the plant by the heavy HVAC load.

On the submarine I think there are 7 different copies of the reactor plant control manuals. Some aspects of the manuals are based on limitations from prior plant designs and then they update them periodically over time. I was the person who put all the manual changes in all 7 sets, which made it easy to memorize the changes as they happened. Sometimes during ORSE they would grade you on a drill that you were not allowed to even test on, and then if you did something in a way that would be the logical way to do things you could lose points for not doing the procedure aligned with older way on older ship designs, and then they would update the reactor plant manuals to the way you should do them as you did & lost points for. :D

The ship also had the ability to run the coolant pumps and arbitrary frequencies to change the submarine's sound signature. One night while standing watch one of the pumps went offline and I had to switch the pump configuration. If you were in an active war zone the response procedure to this would be different than the response when you are not. This is something you are never drilled on either.

When I joined the Navy I had a 99 score on the ASVAB and then took the nuclear test, which was mostly just math and logic stuff. The test had 80 questions on it and they asked me how many I thought I got right. I said 76 and they laughed at me, saying nobody ever scored that high. Then I explained there were 4 questions left when I got bored and the correct answer was not even listed as an option one of those last four questions and they said "oh you saw that one" and I was like "yep." They then got my test score and it was 76.

The above math stuff was consistent with early childhood. In second grade my teacher would take the workbook away from me because I would do it in advance. After grade school they had me take the college level entrance exam and I was at college sophomore level in math and was only at around my grade level in literature. Thus, as logic might not suggest, I became a writer.

My wife met me around the height of my popularity, so my domain expertise hid a lot of the ... erm ... flaws in my personality. Like if you love a topic and are seen through that lens you look better than you are, because you are being judged at your best rather than your average. Quite often I swing and miss on the social front. If ever I get too frustrated with things I just walk away to reframe because sometimes I don't know how to re-center without like a frame switch. My wife and I both like watching the Love on the Spectrum series on Netflix, though she still wants to see me as being a bit less eccentric than I am (love is blind & all of that).

If I were born at a different time I might have been featured in a show like that Netflix series. In high school someone was stopped just outside of the class by a police officer and they were doing a field sobriety test. I said I am not as think as you drunk I am occifer and the whole class laughed. Then a classmate named Amy, who I believe was the homecoming queen and prom queen blurted out "I bet Aaron would be a fun guy to go out with." The teacher in that class was great at ribbing me, but in this instance he immediately goes into cupid mode.

him: You like him?
her: Yes
him: and you like her?
ne: Yes
him: so why aren't you going out?
me: I don't know.

That was the last time that topic came up at school and that was that. Or almost the end of that story.

Then a little over a year later I am in the Navy and go home to visit my family for the first time. My brother has me take him to a dance club and he does not tell me it is a gay club, but tells all his friends I am his 18 year old brother in the Navy. I felt like the prom queen or homecoming queen with all the pitches there but was all "no thanks." This club is like 70 miles from where I lived and out of the blue the same girl from high school is randomly there that night. I still am socially awkward and it is loud as hell, so she probably concluded "oh that is why" without understanding the autistic part.

A lot of people struggle to distinguish between when I am being dead serious or joking. Some of the real stories sound fake and some of the jokes sound real, but I don't mix up the deliveries anywhere near as much as I should, and sometimes the effort to say I am being real or it is just a joke is taken as the affirmation of the opposite.

When we ran an office I told our workers they should be able to get at least 2 or 3 links a day. They thought I was being overly optimistic, so then I spent a day implementing the same advice I was giving and got like 18 links that day. Angel was a consistent performer until the office closed. Ralph was more hit or miss, but when he saw the results he became more consistent.

We had one writer who had a fake college degree. I did not want to hire her because I saw excessive keyword repetition in her writing sample. The lawyer wanted me to wait like a quarter year or something before firing her. I go home frustrated every time I read her work because I knew I spent more time and effort rewriting it than she spent writing it in the first place. The topic depth was such that she could write an article about search engines broadly and somehow just happen to miss the existence of Google. When it comes time to fire her my wife and lawyer went in the room with me and I have to look like a total heel as both of them tell her they were rooting for her and I just come across as like a destroyer of dreams or something (when really she was just mailing it in). Then the worker comes in to pick up her last check a few weeks later and my wife means to text me a message and accidentally sent it to the ex-worker. This is a rare instance where karma overrides my wife's social graces and I am a little less bad than I looked previously. :D

For as horrific as my interpersonal skills are, which rely on socially awkward jokes as like table stakes right after hello & get bored quickly, my old business partner who made it to partner at an ad agency before quitting the agency world to work online told me I had the best marketing instincts he had ever seen by someone not actually formally trained. But, me being the fool that I am, I tried to pair him (an eloquent perfectionist who has a keen eye for kerning and monochromatic design) with another one of my friends who tended to do things a bit sloppy but was fast as hell. That did not work out too well. My social awkwardness made me unaware that my range of being able to work with A or B did not mean A and B would work well together. It was only after I engineered that trainwreck that I realized what I did there.

A lot of my marketing knowledge actually came from collecting baseball cards in high school and selling them at flea markets and baseball card shows. One time at a flea market an older guy who was selling cards came by with a fat stack of cash and was like "I am cleaning up" so then I checked out his layout and approach and instantly got the contextually relevant stuff. The baseball player who was born nearby will sell for above book price, organizing cards by favorite player makes it easy for people to self-select categorizing what they would like to pay the most for, having oddities that are offbeat or weird guarantees having something that a player collector does not yet have, you don't always need to have the newest products to make sales, being organized was a great way of adding value to product, some cards would sell better at card shows and others would sell better at flea markets, you can predict trends by media coverage and (for example) know that certain players would become widely collected as their media coverage went up after being traded (like Dennis Rodman going to the Chicago Bulls), and on and on.

One time in high school I was sick the same day that another kid named Aaron was sick. He was a year ahead of me in math. Then the next day the math teacher was sick and the substitute teacher gave me the wrong exam. I did a little over half of the test and I turned it in to the teacher because I explained it had to be the wrong exam as it would take me almost the entire period to complete. She asked if I was sure because I had all the answers right so far.

Somehow a lot of my life has been a bit self-organized around autistic stuff without any of it being intentional. I told my friend who was the best man at my wedding about my daughter being diagnosed as on spectrum and he told me the nut does not fall far from the tree, he is on spectrum and is almost certain I am. My lead writer I am sure is on spectrum. When we had an office he was in his own world in a way that our glue player and lead designer were a bit in awe of. He added social charm to situations in about the same way I did. When I showed my head programmer my test results he (who calls me out when I am wrong) was arguing that if anything my answers were completely reasonable to him and his score would be even higher, then he sent me Am I German or Autistic?.

Result: Both. The Wittgenstein Result. German 47%. Autistic 51%.

For the skills I have in math some of the interpersonal skills I have suck because I can get bored and/or sidetracked. My wife is great at seeming interested in just about everything. I am much narrower in my interests and am not even capable of faking interests in most topics. I have always only ever had like a few close friends who really cared for me and then not much of a big circle beyond that. You can always go watch pro sports, live music, or Cirque du Soleil for some inspiration. Though most of life is the boring day to day stuff. Having a consistent routine, trying to be healthy, and get your 20,000 steps a day if you can.

Tokyo is such a great city to walk around.

There are certain actions people take that I would just not estimate were in the realm of human potential. Like historically I thought some large systems of power were highly corrupted through layers of inefficiency and principal-agent problems stacked atop each other, but I simply failed to grasp how some people are absolute psychopaths until seeing the trail of carnage they created.

The good news for psychopath criminal frauds Christopher Angus and Stella Huh is they are going to get a lot of media exposure in the near future.

The bad news for psychopath criminal frauds Christopher Angus and Stella Huh is the type of exposure they will be getting.

They will be accurately branded as the utter human garbage that they are. I will blog regularly until both of the criminals are rotting in cages where they belong. And since their crimes are of the racketeering variety, each charge of each type is a separate 20 year sentence. Both of these scumbags will die in cages - as they should.

Shout out to Karl Blanks and Ben Jesson from Conversion Rate Experts. Back when we worked together they told me their favorite blog posts of mine were the flame-styled posts. Those posts never made many sales but were always super satisfying, as though a blog post was helping to realign the universe. I predict a record fruitful harvest this year. Karl was a former rocket scientist, and I am about to blast off soon.

I hope Chris and Stella enjoy the ride as much as I love becoming the captain of their lives. Excitement ahead. Things will fall into place. :)

Criminal Christopher Angus Fakes IG Data

Video Background

Investment guru, psychopath, and criminal fraud Christopher Angus is kicking off a confidence series, providing free video tutorials on how to defraud investors. This nineteenth video is 8:46 & was shared on November 21, 2016. The criminal who shot these videos delivered over a 99% investment loss, as he simply stole the money and integrated it into other investment scams abroad.
https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/18693916.conman-christopher-angus-pay-...
The UK Crown Police never followed the money trail.

Christopher Angus is associated with Stella Huh and Timothy Barton, who stand trial in the United States on November 2, 2026.
http://www.seobook.com/stella-huh/criminal-case-docket-sheet%204-22-2026-(22-cr-00352).pdf

Video Highlights

  • chart date shows November 21 of 2016 near bottom.
  • the same date appears at the top right of the browser and the words "Christopher Angus iMac"
  • the deal.ig.com/platform/index.html URL contains the variable ?201611161220 which I believe means it was 12:20 on November 16 of 2016
  • the alleged account shows balance of 4,487,582 GBP (either this account was real at the time or he doctored not just the static images he sent me but also videos - yet another indication of intent to defraud)
  • it also shows S&P 500 at 2187 to 2188. on that date the s&p 500 traded specifically in that range. finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EGSPC/history?period1=1479456000&period2=1479801600&interval=1d&filter=history&frequency=1d low: 2,186.43 & high: 2,198.70
  • the November 21, 2016 date is also shown via the interactive chart scroll over at 1 minute and 5 seconds
  • this video was created LONG AFTER Chris took all the deposits from me, indicating all the IG stuff he ever showed me was absolute constructed fraud from the onset and Chris did indeed do what he "joked" about on Skype - he had converted my investment to Bitcoin and then laundered it through Stella Huh across to the Wall Cos controlled by Timothy Barton.

A version of this video is available for download at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/trxqkc39j76iy9d/algovid2.mp4?dl=0

Video Transcript

00:00 Christopher Angus: Hello, Mr. A, just a very quick video, just to follow up on the one from Friday, if you took the time to watch that. If not, well, maybe you won't watch this one either, but let's have a go anyway. So I wanted to show you what it actually looks like instead of just like looking at some numbers flashing up and down, but on a chart. And you'll see why you need to actually look at the order book to see when the market turns. But anyway, let me just change this to a candlestick chart, because you can't really see it with the line, that's if you look at charts, which when I was trained, I was trained not to look at charts, because they can be very misleading. But let me just zoom out a bit here and just show you what it looks like.

00:58 Christopher Angus: If you remember on Friday, the volume came down, the market came down, paused, went down a couple of more ticks, and then it sprung back up. And that's exactly what I'm going to show you here. So this is a classic example of a pullback move. Now, you can see there's actually been quite a few. If I was making one tick, I could have done it there, there, there. But let's just look at the most extreme example, which is here. So remember the padding. As the market starts to come down, you'll see there's a huge spike in volume. And this is generally selling volume. So you'll see a big, big spike in volume, or you'll see a building amounts of volume, and that will be when the market can't break through the next level. It can't actually break down, and you'll see a big surge of selling.

01:55 Christopher Angus: And then what will happen is... I'll just get off there... The market will then pause, which is exactly... Look, it's come down two ticks. This looks like exactly what happened on Friday, but this is today. It comes down, flutters around, and then starts to go back up. And then the opposite is true in reverse. You can see what happened here about like a quarter passed. There was a huge volume of buying, I mean, it's not a huge, because it has moved like two points, but it looks like a big move. So the market's moved up a couple of points. And then the market stalled, it stalled in about... That's a one... Basically one or two tick range. And then it started to come off again. And that's how it looks. Let me just see if I can find one more example in hours from last week. So Friday... God, I hate these charts so much. Alright, this is the open, just ignore that, because it's always really, really noisy.

03:21 Christopher Angus: But this one would have worked here. You can see there's has just been a sell-off. Big spike down, hovers around, and then it comes back up one tick. It's not the greatest example, but that would have worked. And then if we go out to the next one here, because the volume has to really be two or three times higher than the kind of the average volume. So you're looking for really big bursts of volume. Also, the market has to have a direction. So if it's going sideways and then you have a burst of volume, you can't touch it. If it's moving down and there's a burst of volume, then you can touch it. If it's moving up, and there's a burst of volume, then you can touch it. And also you need to see a falling... An amount of falling volume, so you see a big spike volume, and then you see falling volumes.

04:13 Christopher Angus: So, it goes high and then it goes low, and if the market is stalled there for about 30 seconds, then you can usually take the trade. So this first one here, you couldn't, because you need to see a falling volume. So this one here would be the first time we could have taken it. So here we are. So the market's been moving down, sharp move down, two-volume, high spikes. Can't make a lower low. Okay, can't break down to the next level. Falling volume... Trade here, wait... That would have even a long trade there, but... What's that, about 5, 10 minutes. But you see, it just doesn't break lower. Occasionally you do get stopped out, but if you get stopped out for two or three ticks maybe, and you're doing 7, 8, 9, 10 of these a day, it's fine. Mine is through commissions.

05:04 Christopher Angus: I worked out that I'd probably make... If you make, say, a 1000 pounds in gross profit, you probably would have made 2000 pounds throughout the course of the day. Because capital losses and then your commissions, but that's just roughly half. But you know, that doesn't matter. High-frequency trading guys lose 50, 47% of the time, so that's another example. And you can see another one here. Okay, there's another high burst of volume that's around two times that the number average of the last... It's a really... This that stands out tremendously. And then there's falling volume. So then you can see the next buy, there's a lower volume and a pause. And then you would have sold it, you would have sold it there and then picked up once it hit there. And the goal is... Really is to automate that and then stream it across all the different markets, like you can see here.

06:13 Christopher Angus: The S&P, Wall Street is the Dow. The tick 100 is the Nasdaq. Probably won't work on the Russell, but it will work on the Dax. Probably won't work that well on Forex, but there's lots and lots of markets here. The treasury markets, which are really, really liquid and have the same kind of behavior. And the goal is to really get 10 or 20 different instruments running at the same time. Run to buy and sell like 100, 200, 330 lots at a time, depending on the market and pick up three or 4000 to trade. Multiply that out by, let's call it five trades a day, that's 15 grand, then multiply that out again by 10 different instruments, that's like a 150,000, that's like the top line, but that's what I was saying. And... Like really consistent churn of 20 files a day. This is really what I'm excited about, and what I'm working towards.

07:16 Christopher Angus: But I wanted to follow up the video on Friday, with what I said or showed you with the numbers and stuff because it's very really hard to see if you don't sit there. And you're going to look at it for five years and you can't read the order volume properly... That's what I sort of trying to point it out, but I wanted to kind of show you in reality what... People puking out looks like. The parading, the reversal, and it's pretty straightforward. Now, one thing I'll finish off with is, remember I said that I think you need the order book. And that is if the order book... The candle chart doesn't really show you what's on the order book, it only shows you what's happened.

08:05 Christopher Angus: So if you see the order books, like really, really thin on your side, so say you're trying to buy it, but you see it's like really, really thin, the candle chart would still show you the same thing, but it doesn't show you that the order book's really weak. So if you don't have the order book, you'll come in and buy this, and then just watch the thing collapse away from you, and then you'll be... And then you'll be stopped out. And without actually seeing what's going on in the order book, it's very, very hard to tell what's going on and whether the move is a really a safe move to make. And that's it, for now. So, hope you enjoy the video, and I'll catch you later. Bye for now.

Conman Christopher Angus Touts New Trading Algorithms

Video Background

Christopher Angus used funds stollen from Giovanna Villanueva and Aaron Wall to help fund the Wall companies associated with Timothy Barton, using Stella Huh to move the money across.

Since the Timothy Barton case is only a few months away, we thought it made sense to do a throwback confidence series, sharing the voice and dissemblings of the criminal who started it all.

These are Christopher's free confidence videos he used to defraud investors. This eighteenth video is 5:19 & was shared on November 18, 2016. The criminal who shot these videos delivered over a 99% investment loss, as he simply stole the money and integrated it into other investment scams abroad.
https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/18693916.conman-christopher-angus-pay-...
The UK's Crown Police never followed the money trail.

Christopher Angus is associated with Stella Huh and Timothy Barton, who stand trial in the United States on November 2, 2026.
http://www.seobook.com/stella-huh/criminal-case-docket-sheet%204-22-2026-(22-cr-00352).pdf

Video Highlights

  • X trade professional platform, he says gaining access to it allegedly requires having a broker account.
  • interesting bit: shows mechanics of a trade, mentions wanting to be a billionaire so bad in a song at the end of the video.

A version of this video is available for download at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ug0y0z7ao3tn8uu/orderbookalgo.mp4?dl=0

Video Transcript

00:00 Christopher Angus: Okay so a very quick video about five minutes in total, I just wanna show you kind of what I am working on at the moment. Just a pure interest. Remember what I said about padding, so you watch where there is a lot of volume that comes through if that volume doesn't break a certain level, then you know that someone is absorbing those orders. So if the market's going down and you're selling and there is a lot of selling going on but it is not breaking a level, you know that it is called an iceberg order. So someone is just sitting there taking the orders, taking the orders, taking the orders, taking orders, and they are gonna run it back up a little, maybe like one point, a few ticks whatever. And that's really riding the wave of the big money. You're gonna see that now. Now, the platform I'm showing you is called Xtrade, it's a professional platform. I have it for the data feed, I got a pad for each month via a broker, so to get that I actually have to have a broker account, which obviously I have a futures broker account, I got a few of them, costs quite a bit about 1200 a month, but it's totally necessary for everything I do.

01:09 Christopher Angus: So I'm gonna trade one lot, nothing I don't have much money at the broker, I don't trade with a broker like this at the moment because I'm doing something else very soon, maybe I'll think about moving across or moving some across or making a new fund, or I do not know but we'll have to see what happens. But I just wanna show you the algorithm in a kind of points and click style so you can see what I do and see why this is very, very interesting, for me and for you. So I am gonna start the video and you'll see something. So just before I start, you'll see what I saw here was there was a lot of selling going on it and it sort of come down a little and it had come down a little and then it had bounced about one tick and then I saw some more selling. You can see that 91. So what I'm looking for is more selling that's not really going any lower. And then I wanna see some buying and you'll see that come through now, so I'll start the video.

02:23 Christopher Angus: Also the speed of the tape here makes a difference. So the tape's, not really going anywhere at the moment, but you'll see, it will start moving in a second. So I've seen that, I haven't placed an order and I can see the markets, can see that's 61. Now, that really caught my eye. It's nine, that's a 2179 and a quarter. And I see that, doesn't break so I decide I'm gonna put one lot on, I put the lot on here, so got one order in, I'm 65 of 90 in the queue and boom I am taken. Okay, so now I am in the market, I am one contract long. Each tick is worth $12.50, four ticks make a point, it's $50 a point on the S&P minis. So I'm now in the market, I have two orders waiting, one to stop if it rips back down one point then I'm gonna be taken out and I'm gonna lose a point or if it goes back up, I've got a limit order waiting here. I'm number 143 in the queue of 184. So what I'm looking for here is I'm looking for pressure building on each side, so I want the bids to start increasing and I want the offers to start decreasing, I wanna see some trading on the offer here. So that's gonna push the price up then the offers are gonna be taken out.

03:48 Christopher Angus: Okay so now so you'll see that someone is cleared off a big price. You'll see... You see that 80 there boom. Okay, so now... Now we've got some buying action that's going up and you can see it's rather blue as opposed to red as when I bought into weakness. You've gotta sell into strength and buy into weakness. And now my order is 101 now, it was 115 a second ago, now I'm break even I'm back to where I bought and it's just ticking around here. Okay so now it's actually sitting on the offer so technically I am $12.50 up I just have to see that order disappear now, that's my order to sell, so I bought and that's my order to sell. 54 in the queue of 110. And you can see there is a bit of pressure building up here 'cause that's 54. Now, there's more people joining the offer to try and push the price back down or they may be just joining the offer to then lift. Okay, boom so there I was taken out and that's it, that's the whole trade beginning to end, around two minutes. Like I said, a little bit... Need a bit more optimizing 'til we're done but this is the future, this is the future for sure. I wanna be a billionaire, so freaking bad and I won't quit my day job. Thanks for all. Bye bye.

Christopher Angus Bitcoin Fraud Diversion Strategy

Video Background

Christopher Angus is an associate of Stella Huh, who is the silent partner in the Timothy Barton racketeering criminal syndicate. While using a hacked version of Google Gemini on my wife's computer Stella Huh gave my wife Giovanna Villanueva a ready-made template to frame me for Stella's criminal activities. In these chats Stella also mentioned that she changed the keys on a Bitcoin wallet & was trying to get Aaron arrested for contempt of court by claiming Aaron was responsible for the evidence spoilation and wallet rekeying that criminal fraud Stella Huh did.

Conman swindler Christopher Angus is kicking off a confidence series, providing free video tutorials on how to defraud investors. This seventeenth video is 8:44 & was created on June 30, 2016. The criminal who shot these videos delivered over a 99% investment loss, as he simply stole the money and integrated it into other investment scams abroad.
https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/18693916.conman-christopher-angus-pay-...
Crown Police never followed the money trail.

Christopher Angus is associated with Stella Huh and Timothy Barton, who stand trial in the United States on November 2, 2026.
http://www.seobook.com/stella-huh/criminal-case-docket-sheet%204-22-2026-(22-cr-00352).pdf

Video Highlights

  • 0 minutes 0 seconds: shows interface of new algo, states it is managed on a hybrid basis where some parts are automated while he manages the work actions / can stop to close out working orders in a second.
  • 1 minute 25 seconds: algo contains synthetic stops which automatically close out positions
  • 2 minutes 15 seconds: given demo account settings an account with 200k could have make 27k with new algo
  • 3 minutes 30 seconds: interface shows "rebate"
  • 3 minutes 35 seconds: wants to test algo for 7 winning days in a row. if there is 1 losing day in the 7 won't push algo live.
  • 3 minutes 50 seconds: interface shows trailing stops, stop distances, spreads & instruments traded
  • 4 minutes 30 seconds: shows how positions are automated
  • 5 minutes 15 seconds: explains why can't run this algo & the traditional VIX trades at same time. also bottom of video in footer of page has "copyright Warlock Media 2016"
  • 8 minutes 10 seconds: shows how quickly he can click a button to exit all positions and close all orders

A version of this video is available for download at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1uw2pgymmytbteb/video%2016%202016%20june%2030....

Video Transcript

00:00 Christopher Angus: Hello A, long time no video. I just wanted to just give you a quick rundown of the algo, and I notice that you wanna be quiet after. I said I don't wanna run the two strategies simultaneously. And the reasons are, it's a bit difficult with the algo at the moment, because it's basically become a hybrid version.

00:16 Christopher Angus: It's not running on its own autonomously because it's too dangerous to do so. So I've got to make a decision when to start the algo, when to stop it, and when to take the profits if I need to. The algo will take the profits, but the most efficient way to make money is for me to actually decide because there's a bit more discretion involved, and I got a much better feel of the markets than the algo, because it's very hard to program in things which are very binary. So if this, then that, I might have tamer conditions, but it's still not as good as a human being. And it's very hard to articulate how I see things. I don't think I could do it effectively, and certainly not to turn it into computer code effectively.

00:52 Christopher Angus: So the algo will... There's just three parts to it, actually. I'll just start there. The reopen the baby steps things is, basically, once I start the thing, it will then make decisions of when to reopen positions, when to add to positions on its own. Also, close any old working orders, so basically if we make a market and the market moves far away, then it will look and see if working orders are quite far away from the level of the current market price at the time, to delete those off and then replace them at a better place. And then I've got some synthetic trailing stops which work very differently to normal trailing stops. Basically, you can follow the price, which normal trailing stops has tons of limitations and they don't work very well.

01:36 Christopher Angus: And these instruments that I'm trailing at the moment, I'm at a 12 on the list, but only eight are active, and that's because of various reasons, some of which is because it's on the demo. So I actually do have... Algo is running at the moment, and you can see here, we got some working orders waiting. They are a little bit away from the market level, but I'll just go back here and I'll just show you. So today again, we've had an excellent day, based on a 200,000 pound account, we made 27 grand. Not bad. Had 147 trades, had quite a few losses, quite a few wins, but overall, our losses way, way, way, are way, way, way smaller than the amount that we win.

02:32 Christopher Angus: Now, just to explain a bit further. This takes an awful lot of concentration when things are actually moving. Once orders start getting hit, if that happens, you'll see that I'm gonna struggle to talk if we actually get to that point. The market's very stalled at the moment, even though there are working orders in place. So I'll just quickly go through some other stuff here, so close that. I'll look at yesterday's reports, I think I sent you a screenshot of that. So we look at that. Yesterday, 4990 and then the next day, the day before, I mean, 22,000. I'll just give you a bit of detail. I reset everything, put the demo back to 200,000 pounds, because it's really representative of the small account. And so right now, I'm gonna try and do seven days in a row, and if I got one losing day, we can't go live.

03:41 Christopher Angus: Now, had really good run up to that point, but now it was like, "Right, this is the final, final test. All my settings are optimized." And you can see here, I can see the distance, division and size. These are all my settings so that the algo knows when to place orders, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. We do run stops so we do take losses instead of just buying more to try and get out of it. But we found it much more effective, or I found it much more effective should I say, to take small losses and restart when conditions in the market permit. So we've had stuff starting to come in on its own, one position in Germany, another one on France, so that's the DAX and the CAC. And we'll have to see how those go in the next couple minutes. I don't wanna make this video too long. So and you'll see that those have been hit, that it's now replaced. Something else has been hit there. There's the FTSE that's come in, so Europe's really moving a bit more strongly as you can see than Wall Street and NASDAQ and the S&P.

05:01 Christopher Angus: Now this is where it gets tricky. This is why I can't do the VIX at the same time, because I'm having to watch these things and make sure the orders are going through correctly, making sure I pull a profit if the market starts to stall, make sure that if it starts to run back and goes a couple of grand down that I just take the whole lot off, and I don't let them all get stopped out. There's a lot going on, a lot. Okay, so the system's now actually put two FTSE trades on. Generally won't do more than two instruments per group. The system actually determines how many to put on per group, so in any one time, it generally won't run more than two of the same. Sometimes it'll run one, sometimes it'll run two. It just depends on a number of things, momentum, volume and that other crap. So you can see, and if this does move quickly up, it'll make quite a few thousand pounds, and this is how I make a lot of money quickly. I'm looking to make two or 3000 pounds per pop. Although I talk a lot about pops and drops and stuff like that. And it's the same sort of principle. We can see here that these are doing okay, and we're up to 344 already, 446.

06:29 Christopher Angus: And this is why it gets tricky, alright, because I have to watch this and it would just be super, super hard to maintain all of these and this is nothing. I could have 18, 20 positions all running at the same time, maybe more, and manage Big VIX position at the same time. At the moment, I have to say it's not something I wanna do. I can do it on a small account and then do the VIX on the big account while we wait, but once we start doing the algo until I'm used to it and feel like everything and very comfortable with being able to juggle a whole lot of plates, 'cause this is like fucking plates spinning of the highest order. Until I'm at that point, I wanna just do one strategy at a time, because there's too much to lose if I make a mistake. And you can see here it's adding more positions, still looking to create more positions later on.

07:27 Christopher Angus: So we got two FTSEs, and a couple of other things that have come in. That's US Tech 100, that's the NASDAQ, UK stocks 50, that's the stocks, the stocks, the European Index. A couple more things have come in, you can see the profits really ramping up now. 1600, and as you can appreciate, this is really okay. So we had a couple more, another Germany come in. There's two Germanys now, one Sweden, and is that another France, two France positions. Let's see where we're at. 2000 pounds, right. So this is where it gets hard. So I don't like how the market's stalling there. I'm gonna stop the script so it doesn't keep opening positions. I'm gonna take all my positions off, and then I'm gonna take those working orders off and that's it. I don't know how much we made there, probably about 1300 quid, and that's it. But as you can appreciate, that's why it's very hard to make two strategy at the same time in the same account.

08:25 Christopher Angus: Just to sum up, basically, I can do the small account and run this, run the algo, then I can do the big account and keep that in the old one. But once we start running the algo on both accounts, I just wanna stick with one strategy at a time until I'm more comfortable with everything. I'll speak to you soon. That's it for now, cheers.